Do I need AEO as well as SEO?
The term AEO has spread quickly, mostly because AI-generated answers feel like a genuinely new kind of search result, and new terminology tends to follow new formats.
But the actual practices behind AEO – clear structure, direct answers to specific questions, credible sourcing, genuine topical depth – are not new. They’re the same practices that have made content perform well in Google’s featured snippets, People Also Ask boxes, and voice search results for years.
This matters practically because some agencies are now selling “AEO services” as a separate line item, on top of existing SEO work. If your SEO is already being done properly – structured content, direct answers, technical foundations in place – you’re very likely already doing most of what AEO actually describes.
There are a small number of genuinely new considerations – how content gets extracted and summarised by AI systems specifically – worth understanding on their own terms. But these sit inside good SEO practice, not alongside it as a separate discipline requiring its own separate budget.
If someone is pitching you AEO as a brand new category of work you’ve never paid for before, ask specifically what it includes that your existing SEO doesn’t already cover. Often, the honest answer is very little.
The real question isn’t whether you need AEO. It’s whether your existing SEO is actually structured well enough to perform in an AI-driven search landscape, which is a question worth asking regardless of what anyone calls it.
Related Questions
Getting pitched AEO as a new expense?
Ask us for a second opinion on whether it’s genuinely new work, or just SEO with a new name.
